Kansas to Attorney General: Your King Has No Power Here

Image

View this document on Scribd
View this document on Scribd
View this document on Scribd
Advertisements
Published in: on May 3, 2013 at 00:17  Leave a Comment  

I use to swallow all of this rhetoric, yet called myself a thinker…

Some thoughts on my political journey in the wake of the 2012 Republican National Convention in Tampa:

I use to swallow all of this rhetoric, yet called myself a thinker. I supported policies and wars because ‘my’ president supported them. It humbles me to realize that I was actually just believing everything I was told by Bush, other Republican representatives, Fox News, etc. I believed that the GOP stood for the principles I believed in. I paid more attention to what they said than what they did.

My eyes were gradually opened during Bush’s second term. I realized that a government in which the GOP controlled the White House and both houses of Congress still spent like crazy and did nothing to reduce the size of government. I was as frustrated as anyone with Congress by 2006, and even though I did vote for Republicans, it was not a surprise that many lost their seats. I was still a fan of W, though…until September of 2008 when he (and Ryan) pushed for the bailout (which Romney also supported). This was the same year McCain was foisted upon us. I was able to vote for McCain mostly because Palin was on the ticket.

The last few years have given me the opportunity to question why Republicans, in the 6 years they had, did not follow through on what I thought were Republican principles. The things I have learned in that time have helped me to see what is really going on, namely, large corporations, through their lobbyists and their money, are really running this country. I have learned to take politicians’ words with a grain of salt and their voting record as the real truth.

In all this time, Ron Paul was not even on my radar. In January of this year (2012), when, seemingly by chance, I learned that Ron Paul was about to celebrate his 55th wedding anniversary (in contrast to Gingrich who Tim LaHaye had endorsed) and that he was strongly pro-life. This is what led me to learn about his other positions, and I found that he actually voted on legislation based on the Constitution and on what I thought the GOP stood for. I also found that when he spoke, his positions were based on an incredible wealth of knowledge, and that he was more interested in passing on that knowledge than on soundbites and self-promotion. His humility and his principled stance was a breath of fresh air.

Now I hope that I can educate others, so that they can see what I now see. ~Bryan

What they want us to see

The truth

Let Us Now Try Liberty (The Law-Part 75) {Conclusion}

God has given to men all that is necessary for them to accomplish their destinies. He has provided a social form as well as a human form. And these social organs of persons are so constituted that they will develop themselves harmoniously in the clean air of liberty. Away, then, with quacks and organizers! Away with their rings, chains, hooks, and pincers! Away with their artificial systems! Away with the whims of governmental administrators, their socialized projects, their centralization, their tariffs, their government schools, their state religions, their free credit, their bank monopolies, their regulations, their restrictions, their equalization by taxation, and their pious moralizations!

And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty; for liberty is an acknowledgment of faith in God and His works.

~Frédéric Bastiat, The Law, 1850

The Law series STARTS HERE —>

Published in: on October 25, 2010 at 15:52  Leave a Comment  

The Desire to Rule Over Others (The Law-Part 74)

This must be said: There are too many “great” men in the world — legislators, organizers, do-gooders, leaders of the people, fathers of nations, and so on, and so on. Too many persons place themselves above mankind; they make a career of organizing it, patronizing it, and ruling it.

Now someone will say: “You yourself are doing this very thing.” True. But it must be admitted that I act in an entirely different sense; if I have joined the ranks of the reformers, it is solely for the purpose of persuading them to leave people alone. I do not look upon people as Vancauson looked upon his automaton. Rather, just as the physiologist accepts the human body as it is, so do I accept people as they are. I desire only to study and admire.

My attitude toward all other persons is well illustrated by this story from a celebrated traveler: He arrived one day in the midst of a tribe of savages, where a child had just been born. A crowd of soothsayers, magicians, and quacks — armed with rings, hooks, and cords — surrounded it. One said: “This child will never smell the perfume of a peace-pipe unless I stretch his nostrils.” Another said: “He will never be able to hear unless I draw his ear-lobes down to his shoulders.” A third said: “He will never see the sunshine unless I slant his eyes.” Another said: “He will never stand upright unless I bend his legs.” A fifth said: “He will never learn to think unless I flatten his skull.”

“Stop,” cried the traveler. “What God does is well done. Do not claim to know more than He. God has given organs to this frail creature; let them develop and grow strong by exercise, use, experience, and liberty.”

~Frédéric Bastiat, The Law, 1850

Part 75 {Conclusion} – Let Us Now Try Liberty

The Law series STARTS HERE —>

Published in: on October 22, 2010 at 12:53  Leave a Comment  

Proof of an Idea (The Law-Part 73)

And does not experience prove this? Look at the entire world. Which countries contain the most peaceful, the most moral, and the happiest people? Those people are found in the countries where the law least interferes with private affairs; where government is least felt; where the individual has the greatest scope, and free opinion the greatest influence; where administrative powers are fewest and simplest; where taxes are lightest and most nearly equal, and popular discontent the least excited and the least justifiable; where individuals and groups most actively assume their responsibilities, and, consequently, where the morals of admittedly imperfect human beings are constantly improving; where trade, assemblies, and associations are the least restricted; where labor, capital, and populations suffer the fewest forced displacements; where mankind most nearly follows its own natural inclinations; where the inventions of men are most nearly in harmony with the laws of God; in short, the happiest, most moral, and most peaceful people are those who most nearly follow this principle: Although mankind is not perfect, still, all hope rests upon the free and voluntary actions of persons within the limits of right; law or force is to be used for nothing except the administration of universal justice.

~Frédéric Bastiat, The Law, 1850

Part 74 – The Desire to Rule Over Others

The Law series STARTS HERE —>

Published in: on October 21, 2010 at 16:22  Leave a Comment  

The Path to Dignity and Progress (The Law-Part 72)

Law is justice. And it is under the law of justice — under the reign of right; under the influence of liberty, safety, stability, and responsibility — that every person will attain his real worth and the true dignity of his being. It is only under this law of justice that mankind will achieve — slowly, no doubt, but certainly — God’s design for the orderly and peaceful progress of humanity.

It seems to me that this is theoretically right, for whatever the question under discussion — whether religious, philosophical, political, or economic; whether it concerns prosperity, morality, equality, right, justice, progress, responsibility, cooperation, property, labor, trade, capital, wages, taxes, population, finance, or government — at whatever point on the scientific horizon I begin my researches, I invariably reach this one conclusion: The solution to the problems of human relationships is to be found in liberty.

~Frédéric Bastiat, The Law, 1850

Part 73 – Proof of an Idea

The Law series STARTS HERE —>

Published in: on October 20, 2010 at 00:42  Leave a Comment  

Justice Means Equal Rights (The Law-Part 71)

Law is justice. And it would indeed be strange if law could properly be anything else! Is not justice right? Are not rights equal? By what right does the law force me to conform to the social plans of Mr. Mimerel, Mr. de Melun, Mr. Thiers, or Mr. Louis Blanc? If the law has a moral right to do this, why does it not, then, force these gentlemen to submit to my plans? Is it logical to suppose that nature has not given me sufficient imagination to dream up a utopia also? Should the law choose one fantasy among many, and put the organized force of government at its service only?

Law is justice. And let it not be said — as it continually is said — that under this concept, the law would be atheistic, individualistic, and heartless; that it would make mankind in its own image. This is an absurd conclusion, worthy only of those worshippers of government who believe that the law is mankind.

Nonsense! Do those worshippers of government believe that free persons will cease to act? Does it follow that if we receive no energy from the law, we shall receive no energy at all? Does it follow that if the law is restricted to the function of protecting the free use of our faculties, we will be unable to use our faculties? Suppose that the law does not force us to follow certain forms of religion, or systems of association, or methods of education, or regulations of labor, or regulations of trade, or plans for charity; does it then follow that we shall eagerly plunge into atheism, hermitary, ignorance, misery, and greed? If we are free, does it follow that we shall no longer recognize the power and goodness of God? Does it follow that we shall then cease to associate with each other, to help each other, to love and succor our unfortunate brothers, to study the secrets of nature, and to strive to improve ourselves to the best of our abilities?

~Frédéric Bastiat, The Law, 1850

Part 72 – The Path to Dignity and Progress

The Law series STARTS HERE —>

Published in: on October 18, 2010 at 12:52  Leave a Comment  

The Basis for Stable Government (The Law-Part 70)

Law is justice. In this proposition a simple and enduring government can be conceived. And I defy anyone to say how even the thought of revolution, of insurrection, of the slightest uprising could arise against a government whose organized force was confined only to suppressing injustice.

Under such a regime, there would be the most prosperity — and it would be the most equally distributed. As for the sufferings that are inseparable from humanity, no one would even think of accusing the government for them. This is true because, if the force of government were limited to suppressing injustice, then government would be as innocent of these sufferings as it is now innocent of changes in the temperature.

As proof of this statement, consider this question: Have the people ever been known to rise against the Court of Appeals, or mob a Justice of the Peace, in order to get higher wages, free credit, tools of production, favorable tariffs, or government-created jobs? Everyone knows perfectly well that such matters are not within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals or a Justice of the Peace. And if government were limited to its proper functions, everyone would soon learn that these matters are not within the jurisdiction of the law itself.

But make the laws upon the principle of fraternity — proclaim that all good, and all bad, stem from the law; that the law is responsible for all individual misfortunes and all social inequalities — then the door is open to an endless succession of complaints, irritations, troubles, and revolutions.

~Frédéric Bastiat, The Law, 1850

Part 71 – Justice Means Equal Rights

The Law series STARTS HERE —>

Published in: on October 8, 2010 at 12:50  Leave a Comment  

The High Road to Communism (The Law-Part 69)

Mr. de Saint-Cricq would extend his philanthropy only to some of the industrial groups; he would demand that the law control the consumers to benefit the producers.

Mr. Considerant would sponsor the cause of the labor groups; he would use the law to secure for them a guaranteed minimum of clothing, housing, food, and all other necessities of life.

Mr. Louis Blanc would say — and with reason — that these minimum guarantees are merely the beginning of complete fraternity; he would say that the law should give tools of production and free education to all working people.

Another person would observe that this arrangement would still leave room for inequality; he would claim that the law should give to everyone even in the most inaccessible hamlet — luxury, literature, and art.

All of these proposals are the high road to communism; legislation will then be — in fact, it already is — the battlefield for the fantasies and greed of everyone.

~Frédéric Bastiat, The Law, 1850

Part 70 – The Basis for Stable Government

The Law series STARTS HERE —>

Published in: on September 29, 2010 at 16:14  Leave a Comment  

Law & Charity Are Not the Same (The Law-Part 68)

The mission of the law is not to oppress persons and plunder them of their property, even though the law may be acting in a philanthropic spirit. Its mission is to protect persons and property.

Furthermore, it must not be said that the law may be philanthropic if, in the process, it refrains from oppressing persons and plundering them of their property; this would be a contradiction. The law cannot avoid having an effect upon persons and property; and if the law acts in any manner except to protect them, its actions then necessarily violate the liberty of persons and their right to own property.

The law is justice — simple and clear, precise and bounded. Every eye can see it, and every mind can grasp it; for justice is measurable, immutable, and unchangeable. Justice is neither more than this nor less than this. If you exceed this proper limit — if you attempt to make the law religious, fraternal, equalizing, philanthropic, industrial, literary, or artistic — you will then be lost in an uncharted territory, in vagueness and uncertainty, in a forced utopia or, even worse, in a multitude of utopias, each striving to seize the law and impose it upon you. This is true because fraternity and philanthropy, unlike justice, do not have precise limits. Once started, where will you stop? And where will the law stop itself?

~Frédéric Bastiat, The Law, 1850

Part 69 – The High Road to Communism

The Law series STARTS HERE —>

Published in: on September 27, 2010 at 13:35  Leave a Comment  
%d bloggers like this: